Thompson Center Encore Classifieds: General Conversation

Home » General Conversation » General Conversation » 270? 35 caliber? (Why?)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: 270? 35 caliber? [message #41220 is a reply to message #41217]

Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32

gemihur
Messages: 312
Registered: March 2012
Location: Ridgelines of Virginia

Forum Regular

Col. Townsend Whelen would take umbrage to that.
Consider the meplat of the .358 compared to the 30 caliber.
Footprint = Force print
Energy IS everything. Otherwise flip 'em the bird!
I shoot a lot of different size bullets but I have come to give great respect for the energy a little contender can propose to a target chambered in .358X444 Imp.
It is awesome.
To each his own, and I afford you your opinion.
All size of bores/projectiles/chambers available have their place. I have no disdain for any of them.
Thanks,
Jimmy

Think twice...shoot once.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		270? 35 caliber? By: wwkmag on Thu, 26 May 2016 16:26
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: gemihur on Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: wwkmag on Thu, 26 May 2016 20:56
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: Crubear on Wed, 01 June 2016 09:01
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: rchatting on Thu, 14 July 2016 14:25
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: wwkmag on Thu, 14 July 2016 19:52
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: guncrazyhoosier on Wed, 27 July 2016 19:26
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: TScottW99 on Sun, 20 November 2016 19:28
		Re: 270? 35 caliber? By: Crubear on Mon, 21 November 2016 11:19

Previous Topic:	Possible concern - joan10001 - new member
Next Topic:	First Moose 2016

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 20:14:25 EDT 2024